[RFC PATCH] mm: Fetch the dirty bit before we reset the pte
Linus Torvalds
torvalds at linux-foundation.org
Fri Oct 9 04:02:42 AEDT 2020
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:27 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> In copy_present_page, after we mark the pte non-writable, we should
> check for previous dirty bit updates and make sure we don't lose the dirty
> bit on reset.
No, we'll just remove that entirely.
Do you have a test-case that shows a problem? I have a patch that I
was going to delay until 5.10 because I didn't think it mattered in
practice..
The second part of this patch would be to add a sequence count
protection to fast-GUP pinning, so that GUP and fork() couldn't race,
but I haven't written that part.
Here's the first patch anyway. If you actually have a test-case where
this matters, I guess I need to apply it now..
Linus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fork-cleanup
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2530 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20201008/f8c04b97/attachment.obj>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list