[RFC PATCH] mm: Fetch the dirty bit before we reset the pte
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com
Thu Oct 8 20:26:27 AEDT 2020
In copy_present_page, after we mark the pte non-writable, we should
check for previous dirty bit updates and make sure we don't lose the dirty
bit on reset.
Also, avoid marking the pte write-protected again if copy_present_page
already marked it write-protected.
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx at redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill at shutemov.name>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index bfe202ef6244..f57b1f04d50a 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -848,6 +848,9 @@ copy_present_page(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
if (likely(!page_maybe_dma_pinned(page)))
return 1;
+ if (pte_dirty(*src_pte))
+ pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
+
/*
* Uhhuh. It looks like the page might be a pinned page,
* and we actually need to copy it. Now we can set the
@@ -904,6 +907,11 @@ copy_present_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
if (retval <= 0)
return retval;
+ /*
+ * Fetch the src pte value again, copy_present_page
+ * could modify it.
+ */
+ pte = *src_pte;
get_page(page);
page_dup_rmap(page, false);
rss[mm_counter(page)]++;
--
2.26.2
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list