[PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/64s: feature: Work around inline asm issues

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:01:01PM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:58 AM Segher Boessenkool
> <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:36 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > > <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > > "true" (as a result of a comparison) in as is -1, not 1.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:43:11AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote:
> > > What Segher said. :-) Also, if you reverse the comparison, you'll get
> > > a build error.
> >
> > But that means your patch is the wrong way around?
> >
> > -       .ifgt (label##4b- label##3b)-(label##2b- label##1b);    \
> > -       .error "Feature section else case larger than body";    \
> > -       .endif;                                                 \
> > +       .org . - ((label##4b-label##3b) > (label##2b-label##1b)); \
> >
> > It should be a + in that last line, not a -.
> 
> I said so in a follow up email.

Yeah, and that arrived a second after I pressed "send" :-)

> > Was this tested?
> >
> Please don't be insulting. Anyone can make an error.

Absolutely, but it is just a question.  It seems you could improve that
testing!  It helps you yourself most of all ;-)


Segher