Endless soft-lockups for compiling workload since next-20200519
Frederic Weisbecker
frederic at kernel.org
Thu May 21 10:40:36 AEST 2020
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 02:50:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:58:17PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > Just a head up. Repeatedly compiling kernels for a while would trigger
> > endless soft-lockups since next-20200519 on both x86_64 and powerpc.
> > .config are in,
>
> Could be 90b5363acd47 ("sched: Clean up scheduler_ipi()"), although I've
> not seen anything like that myself. Let me go have a look.
>
>
> In as far as the logs are readable (they're a wrapped mess, please don't
> do that!), they contain very little useful, as is typical with IPIs :/
>
> > [ 1167.993773][ C1] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/smp.c:127
> > flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x1fa/0x2e0
So I've tried to think of a race that could produce that and here is
the only thing I could come up with. It's a bit complicated unfortunately:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
tick {
trigger_load_balance() {
raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
//but nohz_flags(0) = 0
}
kick_ilb() {
atomic_fetch_or(...., nohz_flags(0))
softirq() { #VMEXIT or anything that could stop a CPU for a while
run_rebalance_domain() {
nohz_idle_balance() {
atomic_andnot(NOHZ_KICK_MASK, nohz_flag(0))
}
}
}
}
// schedule
nohz_newidle_balance() {
kick_ilb() { // pick current CPU
atomic_fetch_or(...., nohz_flags(0)) #VMENTER
smp_call_function_single_async() { smp_call_function_single_async() {
// verified csd->flags != CSD_LOCK // verified csd->flags != CSD_LOCK
csd->flags = CSD_LOCK csd->flags = CSD_LOCK
//execute in place //queue and send IPI
csd->flags = 0
nohz_csd_func()
}
}
}
IPI�{
flush_smp_call_function_queue() {
csd_unlock() {
WARN_ON(csd->flags != CSD_LOCK) <---------!!!!!
The root cause here would be that trigger_load_balance() unconditionally raise
the softirq. And I have to confess I'm not clear why since the softirq is
essentially a no-op when nohz_flags() is 0.
Thanks.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list