[PATCH 05/14] powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr()

Alexey Kardashevskiy aik at ozlabs.ru
Mon Jul 13 19:54:49 AEST 2020



On 06/07/2020 11:36, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This is used in precisely one place which is in pseries specific platform
> code.  There's no need to have the callback in eeh_ops since the platform
> chooses the EEH PE addresses anyway. The PowerNV implementation has always
> been a stub too so remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall at gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h               |  1 -
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 13 ------------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 22 ++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> index 3d648e042835..1bddc0dfe099 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
> @@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ struct eeh_ops {
>  	int (*init)(void);
>  	struct eeh_dev *(*probe)(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  	int (*set_option)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option);
> -	int (*get_pe_addr)(struct eeh_pe *pe);
>  	int (*get_state)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int *delay);
>  	int (*reset)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option);
>  	int (*get_log)(struct eeh_pe *pe, int severity, char *drv_log, unsigned long len);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> index 79409e005fcd..bcd0515d8f79 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
> @@ -535,18 +535,6 @@ static int pnv_eeh_set_option(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * pnv_eeh_get_pe_addr - Retrieve PE address
> - * @pe: EEH PE
> - *
> - * Retrieve the PE address according to the given tranditional
> - * PCI BDF (Bus/Device/Function) address.
> - */
> -static int pnv_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
> -{
> -	return pe->addr;
> -}
> -
>  static void pnv_eeh_get_phb_diag(struct eeh_pe *pe)
>  {
>  	struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb->private_data;
> @@ -1670,7 +1658,6 @@ static struct eeh_ops pnv_eeh_ops = {
>  	.init                   = pnv_eeh_init,
>  	.probe			= pnv_eeh_probe,
>  	.set_option             = pnv_eeh_set_option,
> -	.get_pe_addr            = pnv_eeh_get_pe_addr,
>  	.get_state              = pnv_eeh_get_state,
>  	.reset                  = pnv_eeh_reset,
>  	.get_log                = pnv_eeh_get_log,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> index 18a2522b9b5e..088771fa38be 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>  #include <asm/ppc-pci.h>
>  #include <asm/rtas.h>
>  
> +static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct pci_dn *pdn);
> +
>  /* RTAS tokens */
>  static int ibm_set_eeh_option;
>  static int ibm_set_slot_reset;
> @@ -301,7 +303,7 @@ void pseries_eeh_init_edev(struct pci_dn *pdn)
>  		eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "EEH failed to enable on device (code %d)\n", ret);
>  	} else {
>  		/* Retrieve PE address */
> -		edev->pe_config_addr = eeh_ops->get_pe_addr(&pe);
> +		edev->pe_config_addr = pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(pdn);
>  		pe.addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
>  
>  		/* Some older systems (Power4) allow the ibm,set-eeh-option
> @@ -431,8 +433,10 @@ static int pseries_eeh_set_option(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
>   * It's notable that zero'ed return value means invalid PE config
>   * address.
>   */
> -static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
> +static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct pci_dn *pdn)
>  {
> +	int config_addr = rtas_config_addr(pdn->busno, pdn->devfn, 0);

Why not use pe->config_addr (and why we have two addresses in eeh_pe
anyway)?


Ah, I guess I just trust you with this one :)


Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>




> +	int buid = pdn->phb->buid;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int rets[3];
>  
> @@ -443,18 +447,16 @@ static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
>  		 * meaningless.
>  		 */
>  		ret = rtas_call(ibm_get_config_addr_info2, 4, 2, rets,
> -				pe->config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid), 1);
> +				config_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), 1);
>  		if (ret || (rets[0] == 0))
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		/* Retrieve the associated PE config address */
>  		ret = rtas_call(ibm_get_config_addr_info2, 4, 2, rets,
> -				pe->config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid), 0);
> +				config_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), 0);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			pr_warn("%s: Failed to get address for PHB#%x-PE#%x\n",
> -				__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->config_addr);
> +				__func__, pdn->phb->global_number, config_addr);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -463,11 +465,10 @@ static int pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr(struct eeh_pe *pe)
>  
>  	if (ibm_get_config_addr_info != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
>  		ret = rtas_call(ibm_get_config_addr_info, 4, 2, rets,
> -				pe->config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> -				BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid), 0);
> +				config_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid), 0);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			pr_warn("%s: Failed to get address for PHB#%x-PE#%x\n",
> -				__func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->config_addr);
> +				__func__, pdn->phb->global_number, config_addr);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -839,7 +840,6 @@ static struct eeh_ops pseries_eeh_ops = {
>  	.init			= pseries_eeh_init,
>  	.probe			= pseries_eeh_probe,
>  	.set_option		= pseries_eeh_set_option,
> -	.get_pe_addr		= pseries_eeh_get_pe_addr,
>  	.get_state		= pseries_eeh_get_state,
>  	.reset			= pseries_eeh_reset,
>  	.get_log		= pseries_eeh_get_log,
> 

-- 
Alexey


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list