[PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Nov 27 08:45:19 AEDT 2019
On 2019-11-26 6:51 pm, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:33 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 25/11/2019 7:44 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>>> Just as an FYI, this introduces a warning on arm32 allyesconfig for me:
>>>
>>> I think the dma_limit argument to iommu_dma_alloc_iova should be a u64
>>> and/or we need to use min_t and open code the zero exception.
>>>
>>> Robin, Nicolas - any opinions?
>>
>> Yeah, given that it's always held a mask I'm not entirely sure why it
>> was ever a dma_addr_t rather than a u64. Unless anyone else is desperate
>> to do it I'll get a cleanup patch ready for rc1.
>
> Sounds good to me too
>
> Robin, since I started the mess, I'll be happy to do it if it helps offloading
> some work from you.
No worries - your change only exposed my original weird decision ;) On
second look the patch was literally a trivial one-liner, so I've written
it up already.
Cheers,
Robin.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list