[PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
Nicolas Saenz Julienne
nsaenzjulienne at suse.de
Wed Nov 27 05:51:59 AEDT 2019
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:33 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 25/11/2019 7:44 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > Just as an FYI, this introduces a warning on arm32 allyesconfig for me:
> >
> > I think the dma_limit argument to iommu_dma_alloc_iova should be a u64
> > and/or we need to use min_t and open code the zero exception.
> >
> > Robin, Nicolas - any opinions?
>
> Yeah, given that it's always held a mask I'm not entirely sure why it
> was ever a dma_addr_t rather than a u64. Unless anyone else is desperate
> to do it I'll get a cleanup patch ready for rc1.
Sounds good to me too
Robin, since I started the mess, I'll be happy to do it if it helps offloading
some work from you.
Regards,
Nicolas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20191126/090e5a50/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list