[PATCH] powerpc/nvdimm: Add support for multibyte read/write for metadata
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com
Thu Jun 6 22:50:31 AEST 2019
Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> writes:
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> Oliver <oohall at gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 2:44 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
>>> <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> ...
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>>>> index 0176ce66673f..e33cebb8ee6c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>>>> @@ -97,42 +97,102 @@ static int drc_pmem_unbind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static int papr_scm_meta_get(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
>>>> - struct nd_cmd_get_config_data_hdr *hdr)
>>>> + struct nd_cmd_get_config_data_hdr *hdr)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned long data[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
>>>> + unsigned long offset, data_offset;
>>>> + int len, read;
>>>> int64_t ret;
>>>>
>>>> - if (hdr->in_offset >= p->metadata_size || hdr->in_length != 1)
>>>> + if ((hdr->in_offset + hdr->in_length) >= p->metadata_size)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> - ret = plpar_hcall(H_SCM_READ_METADATA, data, p->drc_index,
>>>> - hdr->in_offset, 1);
>>>> -
>>>> - if (ret == H_PARAMETER) /* bad DRC index */
>>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - return -EINVAL; /* other invalid parameter */
>>>> -
>>>> - hdr->out_buf[0] = data[0] & 0xff;
>>>> -
>>>> + for (len = hdr->in_length; len; len -= read) {
>>>> +
>>>> + data_offset = hdr->in_length - len;
>>>> + offset = hdr->in_offset + data_offset;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (len >= 8)
>>>> + read = 8;
>>>> + else if (len >= 4)
>>>> + read = 4;
>>>> + else if ( len >= 2)
>>>> + read = 2;
>>>> + else
>>>> + read = 1;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = plpar_hcall(H_SCM_READ_METADATA, data, p->drc_index,
>>>> + offset, read);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (ret == H_PARAMETER) /* bad DRC index */
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return -EINVAL; /* other invalid parameter */
>>>> +
>>>> + switch (read) {
>>>> + case 8:
>>>> + *(uint64_t *)(hdr->out_buf + data_offset) = be64_to_cpu(data[0]);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case 4:
>>>> + *(uint32_t *)(hdr->out_buf + data_offset) = be32_to_cpu(data[0] & 0xffffffff);
>>>> + break;
> ...
>>>
>>> I assume you got the qemu bits sorted out with Shiva? Looks good otherwise.
>>
>> That is correct. I also tested with different xfer values (1, 2, 4, 8)
>> on both Qemu and PowerVM.
>
> With a big endian kernel?
I completed this testing and found new bugs in other parts of the code.
Thanks for the sugestion.
-aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list