[PATCH] powerpc/nvdimm: Add support for multibyte read/write for metadata
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Wed Jun 5 20:51:45 AEST 2019
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Oliver <oohall at gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 2:44 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
>> <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
...
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>>> index 0176ce66673f..e33cebb8ee6c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>>> @@ -97,42 +97,102 @@ static int drc_pmem_unbind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int papr_scm_meta_get(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
>>> - struct nd_cmd_get_config_data_hdr *hdr)
>>> + struct nd_cmd_get_config_data_hdr *hdr)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long data[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
>>> + unsigned long offset, data_offset;
>>> + int len, read;
>>> int64_t ret;
>>>
>>> - if (hdr->in_offset >= p->metadata_size || hdr->in_length != 1)
>>> + if ((hdr->in_offset + hdr->in_length) >= p->metadata_size)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> - ret = plpar_hcall(H_SCM_READ_METADATA, data, p->drc_index,
>>> - hdr->in_offset, 1);
>>> -
>>> - if (ret == H_PARAMETER) /* bad DRC index */
>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return -EINVAL; /* other invalid parameter */
>>> -
>>> - hdr->out_buf[0] = data[0] & 0xff;
>>> -
>>> + for (len = hdr->in_length; len; len -= read) {
>>> +
>>> + data_offset = hdr->in_length - len;
>>> + offset = hdr->in_offset + data_offset;
>>> +
>>> + if (len >= 8)
>>> + read = 8;
>>> + else if (len >= 4)
>>> + read = 4;
>>> + else if ( len >= 2)
>>> + read = 2;
>>> + else
>>> + read = 1;
>>> +
>>> + ret = plpar_hcall(H_SCM_READ_METADATA, data, p->drc_index,
>>> + offset, read);
>>> +
>>> + if (ret == H_PARAMETER) /* bad DRC index */
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return -EINVAL; /* other invalid parameter */
>>> +
>>> + switch (read) {
>>> + case 8:
>>> + *(uint64_t *)(hdr->out_buf + data_offset) = be64_to_cpu(data[0]);
>>> + break;
>>> + case 4:
>>> + *(uint32_t *)(hdr->out_buf + data_offset) = be32_to_cpu(data[0] & 0xffffffff);
>>> + break;
...
>>
>> I assume you got the qemu bits sorted out with Shiva? Looks good otherwise.
>
> That is correct. I also tested with different xfer values (1, 2, 4, 8)
> on both Qemu and PowerVM.
With a big endian kernel?
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list