[PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers
Thiago Jung Bauermann
bauerman at linux.ibm.com
Sat Jul 20 01:45:47 AEST 2019
Lendacky, Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky at amd.com> writes:
> On 7/18/19 2:44 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>
>> Lendacky, Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky at amd.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate
>>>> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in
>>>> patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by
>>>> Janani and removal of sme_active and sev_active symbol exports as suggested
>>>> by Christoph Hellwig.
>>>>
>>>> These patches are applied on top of today's dma-mapping/for-next.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a way to test SME, SEV, nor s390's PEF so the patches have only
>>>> been build tested.
>>>
>>> I'll try and get this tested quickly to be sure everything works for SME
>>> and SEV.
>
> Built and tested both SME and SEV and everything appears to be working
> well (not extensive testing, but should be good enough).
Great news. Thanks for testing!
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list