[PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers
Lendacky, Thomas
Thomas.Lendacky at amd.com
Fri Jul 19 23:12:33 AEST 2019
On 7/18/19 2:44 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Lendacky, Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky at amd.com> writes:
>
>> On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate
>>> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in
>>> patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by
>>> Janani and removal of sme_active and sev_active symbol exports as suggested
>>> by Christoph Hellwig.
>>>
>>> These patches are applied on top of today's dma-mapping/for-next.
>>>
>>> I don't have a way to test SME, SEV, nor s390's PEF so the patches have only
>>> been build tested.
>>
>> I'll try and get this tested quickly to be sure everything works for SME
>> and SEV.
Built and tested both SME and SEV and everything appears to be working
well (not extensive testing, but should be good enough).
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks! And thanks for reviewing the patches.
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list