[PATCH v2 1/2] kasan: support instrumented bitops combined with generic bitops

[Daniel Axtens]

Hi Michael,
> I only just noticed this thread as I was about to send a pull request
> for these two commits.
>
> I think I agree that test_bit() shouldn't move (yet), but I dislike that
> the documentation ends up being confusing due to this patch.
>
> So I'm inclined to append or squash in the patch below, which removes
> the new headers from the documentation. The end result is the docs look
> more or less the same, just the ordering of some of the functions
> changes. But we don't end up with test_bit() under the "Non-atomic"
> header, and then also documented in Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt.
>
> Thoughts?

That sounds good to me.

Regards,
Daniel

>
> cheers
>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst b/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
> index 2caaeb55e8dd..4ac53a1363f6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
> @@ -57,21 +57,12 @@ The Linux kernel provides more basic utility functions.
>  Bit Operations
>  --------------
>  
> -Atomic Operations
> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -
>  .. kernel-doc:: include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h
>     :internal:
>  
> -Non-atomic Operations
> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -
>  .. kernel-doc:: include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h
>     :internal:
>  
> -Locking Operations
> -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> -
>  .. kernel-doc:: include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-lock.h
>     :internal:
>