[PATCH kernel] cxl: Remove unused include

Frederic Barrat fbarrat at linux.ibm.com
Wed Oct 3 18:29:12 AEST 2018



Le 03/10/2018 à 09:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 28/09/2018 22:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> writes:
>>> The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
>>> while it does not so let's remote it.
>>
>> But it does use eg.
>>
>>    OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_SNOOP_ON
>>    OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_CAPI
>>
>> Which come from opal-api.h via opal.h.
>>
>> So you should at least include opal-api.h.
> 
> 
> I'd say that since it includes pnv-pci.h (and this is why this patch
> compiles), it should be a different set of values for powernv (which
> would map 1:1 to OPAL_PHB_xxx). The powernv platform knowledge is
> already intimate enough for a driver to have. Dunno, I found this opal.h
> inclusion confusing, that's all.


I agree, it would be the cleaner way of doing it. It's going to be 
pretty low on my list though...

   Fred


> 
> 
>>
>> cheers
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
>>> index b66d832..8cbcbb7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>> -#include <asm/opal.h>
>>>   #include <asm/msi_bitmap.h>
>>>   #include <asm/pnv-pci.h>
>>>   #include <asm/io.h>
>>> -- 
>>> 2.11.0
> 



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list