RFC on writel and writel_relaxed
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Mar 27 08:26:58 AEDT 2018
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 10:54 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:08:45AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > > This is a super performance critical operation for most drivers and
> > > > directly impacts network performance.
> > Perhaps there ought to be writel_nobarrier() (etc) that never contain
> > any barriers at all.
> > This might mean that they are always just the memory operation,
> > but it would make it more obvious what the driver was doing.
> I think that is what writel_relaxed is supposed to be.
> The only restriction it has is that the writes to a single device
> using UC memory must be kept in program order..
Which requires barriers on some architectures :-)
Also we don't have a clear definition of what happens on WC memory.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev