char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 19 05:03:13 AEDT 2017
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 19:48 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > For 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted.
> > That's all.
>
> I assume that there might be also some communication challenges
> involved.
>
>
> > 3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value.
>
> I tried to reduce deviations from the Linux coding style again.
> You do not like such an attempt for this software area so far.
The problem here in a time line or what comes first. Definitely, you are
trying to fix the code which _is_ upstream vs. the code which _might be_
upstream (exception is drivers/staging).
Why didn't you listen to what people are telling you?
Why are you spending too much time on little sense crap instead of doing
real fixes?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list