[PATCH v5 1/7] powerpc/mm: update ptep_set_access_flag to not do full mm tlb flush
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Nov 25 15:19:57 AEDT 2016
Paul Mackerras <paulus at ozlabs.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:39:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> When we are updating pte, we just need to flush the tlb mapping for
>> that pte. Right now we do a full mm flush because we don't track page
>> size. Update the interface to track the page size and use that to
>> do the right tlb flush.
> [...]
>
>> +int radix_get_mmu_psize(unsigned long page_size)
>> +{
>> + int psize;
>> +
>> + if (page_size == (1UL << mmu_psize_defs[mmu_virtual_psize].shift))
>> + psize = mmu_virtual_psize;
>> + else if (page_size == (1UL << mmu_psize_defs[MMU_PAGE_2M].shift))
>> + psize = MMU_PAGE_2M;
>> + else if (page_size == (1UL << mmu_psize_defs[MMU_PAGE_1G].shift))
>> + psize = MMU_PAGE_1G;
>
> Do we actually have support for 1G pages yet? I couldn't see where
> they get instantiated.
We use that for kernel linear mapping.
>
>> + else
>> + return -1;
>> + return psize;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> static int __init radix_dt_scan_page_sizes(unsigned long node,
>> const char *uname, int depth,
>> void *data)
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
>> index 911fdfb63ec1..503ae9bd3efe 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
>> @@ -219,12 +219,18 @@ int ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> pte_t *ptep, pte_t entry, int dirty)
>> {
>> int changed;
>> + unsigned long page_size;
>> +
>> entry = set_access_flags_filter(entry, vma, dirty);
>> changed = !pte_same(*(ptep), entry);
>> if (changed) {
>> - if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
>> + if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
>> + page_size = PAGE_SIZE;
>> assert_pte_locked(vma->vm_mm, address);
>> - __ptep_set_access_flags(vma->vm_mm, ptep, entry);
>> + } else
>> + page_size = huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma));
>
> I don't understand how this can work with THP. You're determining the
> page size using only the VMA, but with a THP VMA surely we get
> different page sizes at different addresses?
That applies only for hugetlb pages. Ie, for hugetlb vma we use
vm_area_struct to determine the hugepage size.
For THP hugepage configuration we end up calling
int pmdp_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t entry, int dirty)
and for that we do
__ptep_set_access_flags(vma->vm_mm, pmdp_ptep(pmdp), pmd_pte(entry),
address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>
> More generally, I'm OK with adding the address parameter to
> __ptep_set_access_flags, but I think Ben's suggestion of encoding the
> page size in the PTE value is a good one. I think it is as simple as
> the patch below (assuming we only support 2MB large pages for now).
> That would simplify things a bit and also it would mean that we are
> sure we know the page size correctly even with THP.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
> index 9fd77f8..e4f3581 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
> #define _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY 0x00000
> #endif
> #define _PAGE_SPECIAL _RPAGE_SW2 /* software: special page */
> -
> +#define _PAGE_GIGANTIC _RPAGE_SW0 /* software: 1GB page */
> +#define _PAGE_LARGE _RPAGE_SW1 /* software: 2MB page */
I already use _RPAGE_SW1 for _PAGE_DEVMAP (pmem/nvdimm, patch set to the
list but not merged yet). We are really low on software free bits w.r.t
pte and I was avoiding using that.
I was thinking this series is a simpler cleanup of different page table
update interface to take page size as argument.
>
> #define _PAGE_PTE (1ul << 62) /* distinguishes PTEs from pointers */
> #define _PAGE_PRESENT (1ul << 63) /* pte contains a translation */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
> index f4f437c..7ff0289 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ pmd_t pfn_pmd(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t pgprot)
> {
> unsigned long pmdv;
>
> - pmdv = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) & PTE_RPN_MASK;
> + pmdv = ((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) & PTE_RPN_MASK) | _PAGE_LARGE;
> return pmd_set_protbits(__pmd(pmdv), pgprot);
> }
>
I will look at this and see if can make the patch simpler. But do we
really want to use the pte bit for this ? Aren't we low on free pte bits
?
-aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list