[PATCH v6] powerpc: Do not make the entire heap executable

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Sat Nov 5 09:03:26 AEDT 2016


Hi,

Jason just reminded me about this patch. :)

Denys, can you resend a v7 with all the Acked/Reviewed/Tested-bys
added and send it To: akpm, with everyone else (and lkml) in CC? That
should be the easiest way for Andrew to pick it up.

Thanks!

-Kees


On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
> <jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:54:12AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>>> > Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> writes:
>>> >
>>> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >>> On 32-bit powerpc the ELF PLT sections of binaries (built with --bss-plt,
>>> >>> or with a toolchain which defaults to it) look like this:
>>> > ...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com>
>>> >>> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk at redhat.com>
>>> >>> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>>> >>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>>> >>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>>> >>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
>>> >>> CC: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> >>> CC: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>>> >>> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg at redhat.com>
>>> >>> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>>> >>> CC: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com>
>>> >>> CC: linux-mm at kvack.org
>>> >>> CC: linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
>>> >>> CC: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>>> >>> Changes since v5:
>>> >>> * made do_brk_flags() error out if any bits other than VM_EXEC are set.
>>> >>>   (Kees Cook: "With this, I'd be happy to Ack.")
>>> >>>   See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/661595/
>>> >>
>>> >> Excellent, thanks for the v6! Should this go via the ppc tree or the -mm tree?
>>> >
>>> > -mm would be best, given the diffstat I think it's less likely to
>>> >  conflict if it goes via -mm.
>>>
>>> Okay, excellent. Andrew, do you have this already in email? I think
>>> you weren't on the explicit CC from the v6...
>>
>> FWIW (and ping),
>>
>> Tested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com>
>>
>> On ARM32 (kirkwood) and PPC32 (405)
>>
>> For reference, here is the patchwork URL:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/677753/
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Can you pick this up?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Nexus Security



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list