for muram in DTS file, why change #address-cells from <1> to <2>?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Tue May 17 22:43:46 AEST 2016
currently working on a project involving MPC8360 board, and was
handed a patch to the system .dts file that contained the following
snippet for the muram node:
muram at 10000 {
- #address-cells = <1>;
+ #address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "fsl,qe-muram", "fsl,cpm-muram";
- ranges = <0 0x10000 0xc000>;
+ ranges = <0 0 0x10000 0xc000>;
data-only at 0 {
compatible = "fsl,qe-muram-data","fsl,cpm-muram-data";
- reg = <0 0xc000>;
+ reg = <0 0x4000 0x4000>, <0 0x9400 0x1c00>;
};
};
i'm not a .dts file expert, but i'm baffled by the change in the
value of #address-cells. how does that make any sense? it seems to me
that that kind of change is a *really* fundamental change in the
specification of the underlying architecture.
can someone explain what that might mean? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list