[PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible parent clocks

[Scott Wood]

On 06/29/2016 10:02 PM, Yuantian Tang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw at rjwysocki.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM
>> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.tang at nxp.com>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <oss at buserror.net>; Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>;
>> Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd
>> <sboyd at codeaurora.org>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>; linux-
>> clk at vger.kernel.org; linux-pm at vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
>> dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li at nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren
>> <xiaofeng.ren at nxp.com>; Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible
>> parent clocks
>>
>> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw at rjwysocki.net]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM
>>>> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.tang at nxp.com>
>>>> Cc: Scott Wood <oss at buserror.net>; Russell King
>>>> <linux at armlinux.org.uk>; Michael Turquette
>>>> <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>;
>>>> Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>; linux- clk at vger.kernel.org;
>>>> linux-pm at vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo
>>>> Li <leoyang.li at nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren <xiaofeng.ren at nxp.com>; Scott
>>>> Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering
>>>> possible parent clocks
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no comments from
>>>>> anyone else,
>>>> we will merge it in next week.
>>>>
>>>> There is a cpufreq commit depending on it.  Are you going to handle
>>>> that one too?
>>>>
>>> That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can get this from
>> patch comments.
>>
>> I know that it has been ACKed.
>>
>> My question is whether or not you are going to apply it along the [1/2].
>>
>> If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merged and then applied
>> which may not be desirable.
>>
> I hope we can apply both at same time. Seems Scott has a few concerns.
> 
> What you think about this patch? Can you apply it?
> If you have applied this patch, then I can push CPUfreq maintainer to apply another one which will be delayed.

My only concern was getting an ack for this patch (1/2) -- did I miss it
somewhere?

-Scott