[PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible parent clocks

[Yuantian Tang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw at rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:24 AM
> To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.tang at nxp.com>
> Cc: Scott Wood <oss at buserror.net>; Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>;
> Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sboyd at codeaurora.org>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>; linux-
> clk at vger.kernel.org; linux-pm at vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li at nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren
> <xiaofeng.ren at nxp.com>; Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible
> parent clocks
> 
> On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw at rjwysocki.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM
> > > To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.tang at nxp.com>
> > > Cc: Scott Wood <oss at buserror.net>; Russell King
> > > <linux at armlinux.org.uk>; Michael Turquette
> > > <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>;
> > > Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>; linux- clk at vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-pm at vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo
> > > Li <leoyang.li at nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren <xiaofeng.ren at nxp.com>; Scott
> > > Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering
> > > possible parent clocks
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no comments from
> > > > anyone else,
> > > we will merge it in next week.
> > >
> > > There is a cpufreq commit depending on it.  Are you going to handle
> > > that one too?
> > >
> > That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can get this from
> patch comments.
> 
> I know that it has been ACKed.
> 
> My question is whether or not you are going to apply it along the [1/2].
> 
> If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merged and then applied
> which may not be desirable.
> 
I hope we can apply both at same time. Seems Scott has a few concerns.

What you think about this patch? Can you apply it?
If you have applied this patch, then I can push CPUfreq maintainer to apply another one which will be delayed.

Regards,
Yuantian

> Thanks,
> Rafael