[PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS
Naveen N. Rao
naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Sep 30 02:31:36 AEST 2015
On 2015/09/29 12:47PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:30:10PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > > Suka has also posted a fix for this with a different approach [1]. Can
> > > > you please ack/pull one of these versions? Building perf is broken on
> > > > v4.3-rc due to this.
> > >
> > > I did not get any answer for additional comments I made to the patch
> > > (couldnt get marc.info working, sending the patch again)
> >
> > Hi Jiri,
> > I concur with the changes you proposed to my patch here (getting rid of
> > the weak variant):
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2046108
> >
> > I am aware of the other approach you posted (and the one attached
> > below). When I said "please ack/pull one of these versions", I meant one
> > of: your version, Suka's and mine.
>
> I was hoping somebody could test it on ppc ;-)
>
> I think the last version (in my last email) that keeps the weak
> variable is correct, let's wait for Arnaldo to sort this out
I just tried it, but it fails. As Suka points out in his patch:
"Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a
redefinition error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static
inline version in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef
HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that function."
- Naveen
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list