[PATCH V3 3/5] mm: mlock: Introduce VM_LOCKONFAULT and add mlock flags to enable it

Jonathan Corbet corbet at lwn.net
Sat Jul 11 02:11:18 AEST 2015


On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:46:35 -0400
Eric B Munson <emunson at akamai.com> wrote:

> > One other question...if I call mlock2(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on a range that
> > already has resident pages, I believe that those pages will not be locked
> > until they are reclaimed and faulted back in again, right?  I suspect that
> > could be surprising to users.  
> 
> That is the case.  I am looking into what it would take to find only the
> present pages in a range and lock them, if that is the behavior that is
> preferred I can include it in the updated series.

For whatever my $0.02 is worth, I think that should be done.  Otherwise
the mlock2() interface is essentially nondeterministic; you'll never
really know if a specific page is locked or not.

Thanks,

jon


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list