[RFC 0/2] Memoryless nodes and kworker
tj at kernel.org
Sat Jul 19 04:01:10 EST 2014
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:00:08PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This isn't a huge issue but it shows that this is the wrong layer to
> deal with this issue. Let the allocators express where they are.
> Choosing and falling back belong to the memory allocator. That's the
> only place which has all the information that's necessary and those
> details must be contained there. Please don't leak it to memory
> allocator users.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev