[PATCH] power, sched: stop updating inside arch_update_cpu_topology() when nothing to be update
Michael wang
wangyun at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Apr 4 14:48:50 EST 2014
Hi, Srivatsa
Thanks for your reply :)
On 04/03/2014 04:50 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
[snip]
>
> Now, the interesting thing to note here is that, if CPU0's node was already
> set as node0, *nothing* should go wrong, since its just a redundant update.
> However, if CPU0's original node mapping was something different, or if
> node0 doesn't even exist in the machine, then the system can crash.
By printk I confirmed all cpus was belong to node 1 at very beginning,
and things become magically after the wrong updating...
>
> Have you verified that CPU0's node mapping is different from node 0?
> That is, boot the kernel with "numa=debug" in the kernel command line and
> it will print out the cpu-to-node associativity during boot. That way you
> can figure out what was the original associativity that was set. This will
> confirm the theory that the hypervisor sent a redundant update, but because
> of the weird pre-allocation using kzalloc that we do inside
> arch_update_cpu_topology(), we wrongly updated CPU0's mapping as CPU0 <-> Node0.
Associativity should changes, otherwise we won't continue the updating,
and empty updates[] was confirmed to show up inside
arch_update_cpu_topology().
What I can't make sure is whether this is legal, notify changes but no
changes happen sounds weird...however, even if it's legal, a check in
here still make sense IMHO.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
> Regards,
> Srivatsa S. Bhat
>
>> Thus we should stop the updating in such cases, this patch will achieve
>> this and fix the issue.
>>
>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
>> CC: Nathan Fontenot <nfont at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
>> CC: Robert Jennings <rcj at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> CC: Jesse Larrew <jlarrew at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> CC: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> CC: Alistair Popple <alistair at popple.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> index 30a42e2..6757690 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -1591,6 +1591,14 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
>> cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The 'cpu_associativity_changes_mask' could be cleared if
>> + * all the cpus it indicates won't change their node, in
>> + * which case the 'updated_cpus' will be empty.
>> + */
>> + if (!cpumask_weight(&updated_cpus))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> stop_machine(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0], &updated_cpus);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1612,6 +1620,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
>> changed = 1;
>> }
>>
>> +out:
>> kfree(updates);
>> return changed;
>> }
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list