[PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB
Gavin Shan
shangw at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jun 26 10:12:34 EST 2013
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:57:26AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have
>> PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the
>> one with EEH_PE_PHB.
>>
>>
>> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB]
>> |
>> [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#0
>> |
>
>So we actually have two PEs here ? One real (PE#0) and one imaginary
>(PHB PE) with no PE# associated ?
>
Yes, The (PHB PE) is actually a container to all PEs under the
PHB ;-)
>> -------------------------
>> | |
>> [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#1 [ EEH_PE_BUS] PE#2
>>
>> >I would either not bother and collect the FF's, or make this specific
>> >to fence and only fence.
>> >
>>
>> I'd like to keep it specific to fenced PHB and it's already be
>> that :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list