[PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB

Benjamin Herrenschmidt benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Jun 26 09:57:26 EST 2013


On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have
> PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the
> one with EEH_PE_PHB.
> 
> 
>         [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB]
>                                   |
>                             [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#0
>                                   |

So we actually have two PEs here ? One real (PE#0) and one imaginary
(PHB PE) with no PE# associated ?

>                         -------------------------
>                         |                       |
>                    [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#1     [ EEH_PE_BUS] PE#2
> 
> >I would either not bother and collect the FF's, or make this specific
> >to fence and only fence.
> >
> 
> I'd like to keep it specific to fenced PHB and it's already be
> that :-)

Cheers,
Ben.




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list