[PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Don't collect PCI-CFG data on PHB
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Jun 26 09:57:26 EST 2013
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 07:49 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> It's something like the followings. For ER on PE#0, we will have
> PE with type of EEH_PE_BUS marked as isolated, instead of the
> one with EEH_PE_PHB.
>
>
> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB] <---> [ EEH_PE_PHB]
> |
> [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#0
> |
So we actually have two PEs here ? One real (PE#0) and one imaginary
(PHB PE) with no PE# associated ?
> -------------------------
> | |
> [ EEH_PE_BUS ] PE#1 [ EEH_PE_BUS] PE#2
>
> >I would either not bother and collect the FF's, or make this specific
> >to fence and only fence.
> >
>
> I'd like to keep it specific to fenced PHB and it's already be
> that :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list