[PATCH 2/4 V2] mmc: esdhc: workaround for dma err in the last system transaction

[Zhang Haijun]

On 08/26/2013 09:03 AM, Zhang Haijun wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 11:40 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 14:39 +0800, Zhang Haijun wrote:
>>> Hi, Anton and all
>>>
>>> Is there any advice on these two patches ?
>>>
>>> [PATCH 2/4 V2] mmc: esdhc: workaround for dma err in the last system
>>> transaction
>>> [PATCH 3/4 V3] mmc: esdhc: Correct host version of T4240-R1.0-R2.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> [PATCH 1/4 V4] powerpc/85xx: Add support for 85xx cpu type detection
>>> This patch is Act-by Scott.
>>> Patch 4/4 is split to four patches and Act-by Anton.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks all.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> [snip]
>>>>> +	if (!(((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_T4240) && (SVR_REV(svr) == 0x10))
>>>>> ||
>>>>> +		((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_B4860) && (SVR_REV(svr) == 0x10))
>>>>> ||
>>>>> +		((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P1010) && (SVR_REV(svr) == 0x10))
>>>>> ||
>>>>> +		((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P3041) && (SVR_REV(svr) <= 0x20))
>>>>> ||
>>>>> +		((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P2041) && (SVR_REV(svr) <= 0x20))
>>>>> ||
>>>>> +		((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P5040) && SVR_REV(svr) == 0x20)))
>>>>> +		return;
>> You need to include variants here.  If P5040 is affected, then P5021 is
>> affected.  If P2041 is affected, then P2040 is affected, etc.
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>>
> Hi, Scott
>
> This workaround is for CR:ENGR00229586: A-005055, Configs Affected 
> onlylist these soc and its version.
> I was also wonder why only these boards?
>
> But Ican't add soc like P5021 as I think it should be. Maybe there are 
> some difference between them.
>
> -- 
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Haijun
Hi, Scott

I found there are update about this errata.

I'll update thispatch.

Thanks.

-- 
Thanks & Regards

Haijun

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20130826/1d359db4/attachment.html>