tlb flushing on Power

Seth Jennings sjenning at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Feb 11 06:14:06 EST 2012


On 02/08/2012 03:04 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
>> You can look at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/9/389 in zsmalloc-main.c,
>> zs_[un]map_object() functions for the currently uses of set_pte() and
>> __flush_tlb_one().
>>
>>> set_pte() is long gone on all archs really (or if it's still there it's
>>> not meant to be used as is), use set_pte_at().
>>
>> Problem with set_pte_at() for us is that we don't have an mm_struct to pass
>> because the mapping is not for a userspace process but for the kernel itself.
> 
> Then use init_mm

Thanks, that's what I was looking for.

>> However, I do think this is the portable function we need to be using. Just
>> need to figure out what to pass in for the mm_struct param.
>>
>>> __flush_tlb_one() doesn't mean anything as an arch independent
>>> functionality. We have a local_flush_tlb_page() that -might- do what you
>>> want but why in hell is that patch not using proper existing
>>> interfaces ?
>>
>> flush_tlb_page() is the portable function we should be using.  However,
>> again, it requires a vma_area_struct.  I'm not sure what we should be
>> passing there.
> 
> Do you need this to be CPU local flush or global ? In the later, 
> flush_tlb_kernel_range() is the right API.
> 
> If you want per-cpu, we'll have to add a new arch hook.

We have interrupts disabled, due to the get_cpu_var() on the percpu variable
zs_map_area in zs_map_object(), while the allocation is mapped.  So a CPU local
would be what we need.

--
Seth



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list