[PATCH] net: ibm_newemac: Don't start autonegotiation when disabled in BMCR (genmii)
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Jul 19 22:29:30 EST 2011
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:59 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011 13:35:22 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:50 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > As noticed on a custom 440GX board using the Micrel KSZ8041 PHY in
> > > fiber mode, a strapped fixed PHY configuration will currently restart
> > > the autonegotiation. This patch checks the BMCR_ANENABLE bit and
> > > skips this autonegotiation if its disabled.
> > Won't that just break aneg on everything else ?
> > IE, most other PHYs rely on ANENABLE being set further down this same
> > function (especially if the FW doesn't do it but even then, we may reset
> > PHYs along the way etc...)
> If aneg is enabled for a PHY (e.g. not strapped to fixed configuration), I
> don't see how this patch will change the current aneg behaviour. Perhaps I'm
> missing something, but I tested this on some boards with aneg enabled (Sequoia
> etc). And I didn't notice any problems.
But is aneg always enabled via straps ? The whole point of this function
is that aneg can be enabled or disabled via the ethtool API (thus
overriding whatever strapping)... I may be missing something but this
patch looks like it would break this no ?
> > This is something that really a case where the device-tree should
> > indicate that aneg shall not be performed and from there don't call
> > setup_aneg at all.
> I feel that this BMCR_ANENABLE bit should be evaluated, but I have no strong
> preference here. If you prefer that this should be handled via a new dt
> property (phy-aneg = "disabled" ?), I can implement it this way. Just let me
Don't we already have some bindings for PHY with a fixed setting ? I
don't remember off hand, we need to dbl check.
I don't like looking at BMCR because BCMR is a -control- register,
something that we can (and will) whack with anything ourselves, which
can be reset or reconfigured and I have learned to never trust board
More information about the Linuxppc-dev