RFC: top level compatibles for virtual platforms
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sat Jul 9 12:42:29 EST 2011
On Friday, July 8, 2011, Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825 at freescale.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248
> <B08248 at freescale.com> wrote:
>> "MPC85xxDS" - for a virtual machine for the e500v2 type platforms
>> and would support 85xx targets, plus P2020, P1022,etc
>> "corenet-32-ds" - for a virtual machine similar to the 32-bit P4080
>> "corenet-64-ds" - for a virtual machine based on a 64-bit corenet
> I think we should drop the "DS" because that's a name applied to
> certain Freescale reference boards.
> Is being a CoreNet board really something meaningful with respect to
> KVM? I don't see the connection.
> Also, if these are KVM creations, shouldn't there be a "kvm" in the
> compatible string somewhere?
I would say so. That would accurately describe the execution environment.
> Timur Tabi
> Linux kernel developer at Freescale
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev