RFC: top level compatibles for virtual platforms
B04825 at freescale.com
Sat Jul 9 11:39:26 EST 2011
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248
<B08248 at freescale.com> wrote:
> "MPC85xxDS" - for a virtual machine for the e500v2 type platforms
> and would support 85xx targets, plus P2020, P1022,etc
> "corenet-32-ds" - for a virtual machine similar to the 32-bit P4080
> "corenet-64-ds" - for a virtual machine based on a 64-bit corenet
I think we should drop the "DS" because that's a name applied to
certain Freescale reference boards.
Is being a CoreNet board really something meaningful with respect to
KVM? I don't see the connection.
Also, if these are KVM creations, shouldn't there be a "kvm" in the
compatible string somewhere?
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev