[RFC PATCH] powerpc: Emulate nop too
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
ananth at in.ibm.com
Fri May 28 15:54:26 EST 2010
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:23:30PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
>
>
> In message <20100528041645.GB25946 at in.ibm.com> you wrote:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:28:43PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In message <20100527141203.GA20770 at in.ibm.com> you wrote:
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > > While we are at it, can we also add nop to the list of emulated
> > > > instructions?
> > > >
> > > > Ananth
> > > > ---
> > > > From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth at in.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > Emulate ori 0,0,0 (nop).
> > > >
> > > > The long winded way is to do:
> > > >
> > > > case 24:
> > > > rd = (instr >> 21) & 0x1f;
> > > > if (rd != 0)
> > > > break;
> > > > rb = (instr >> 11) & 0x1f;
> > > > if (rb != 0)
> > > > break;
> > >
> > > Don't we just need rb == rd?
> >
> > Sure. But for this case, just checking against the opcode seems simple
> > enough.
>
> Simple, sure. You could not emulate anything and remove the code
> altogether. That would be truly simple. :-P
Ah.. I misunderstood your initial point about rb == rd with imm = 0.
> Why not eliminate as much as possible?
>
> Anyway, sounds like paulus as a better solution.
Right.
Ananth
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list