CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller

Wolfram Sang w.sang at pengutronix.de
Thu Jun 10 18:59:23 EST 2010


> And which one is "good" or "better" for CAN+MPC52xx if that's
> different?

The mainline kernel works fine here with Phytec based MPC5xxx-boards. Some
custom boards, too. You probably already know that it is always best to
stay as close to mainline as possible ;) Maybe just the lite-support is
slightly bit-rotten? What kind of build-errors do you get with the
mainline-kernel?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20100610/1172b23a/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list