[PATCH] PPC: Sync guest visible MMU state
Alexander Graf
agraf at suse.de
Fri Nov 27 00:16:48 EST 2009
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/26/2009 02:46 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> Please avoid unnamed unions in user-visible headers - they're a gcc
>>> extension.
>>>
>>> Yes, we have them elsewhere, but let's not add to the pile.
>>>
>> I'm open to scalable suggestions that don't break existing userspace
>> code.
>> If I name the union now, existing qemu code will break. If I align the
>> pad array manually I'll definitely mess up something.
>>
>
> You can keep pvr out of the (named) union.
So we'd have
sregs.padded.ppc64.slb?
I don't see how that is an improvement.
Alex
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list