device trees.
Stephen Neuendorffer
stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com
Tue May 12 09:19:15 EST 2009
> >> The best alternative to creating the device tree dynamically
would
> >> be to
> >> append the devicetree to the bitimage in a way the boot loader
could
> >> always find it.
> >>
> >
> > That sounds like a good solution to me.
> >
> I am glad you like it. If Xilinx would like to offer any advice as
> to how to prepend a device tree to the end of a bit file without
> foreclosing any of their future plans or .... I would be happy to
> look at implementing it.
There are options here...
For the benefit of the mailing list: they are tied into how the FPGA
configuration is loaded, and the
particular FPGA family. By far the most portable/generic option is to
simply use an initialized BRAM for this.
David: If you would like to have a discussion regarding particular
design tradeoffs, I'd be happy to, but since I doubt there is anyone on
this list who is interested in the vagaries of FPGA configuration
methods, I suggest we have the discussion privately.
Steve
This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list