[PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx: add Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-IO board (pcm032)

Jon Smirl jonsmirl at gmail.com
Sat Mar 7 13:01:25 EST 2009


On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Robert Schwebel
<r.schwebel at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:33:16PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Would it be easier to get Pengutronix to release a new u-boot for
>> > the pcm030? I'm using U-Boot 1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-2 (Apr 17 2007 -
>> > 11:49:20).
>>
>> Only if it is a chip IO setup problem (like port_config or clock
>> setup). Otherwise the kernel should be setting up the PCI controller
>> correctly. Regardless, I don't think the kernel should be crashing
>> when PCI is in a funny state.
>
> Ack; I didn't follow the thread in detail, but if possible I'd like to
> avoid bootloader updates; it's quite a lot of effort because there are
> thousends of devices in the field, not to mention the whole
> qualification mechanics at Phytec.

On a pcm030 1245-1
u-boot-1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-3,  boots ok and PCI is initialized correctly.

The readme is not clear that tiny-3 should be used on 1245.1 hardware.
http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/bsp/phytec/download/phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny/Readme

This phrase implies the tiny-3 should only be used on 1245.2 hardware.
"U-Boot binary to be used with
OSELAS.BSP-Phytec-phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny-6 (board revision 1245.2)"

Where is the difference between the 1245.0, 1245.1 and 1245.2 hardware
documented?



>
> Wolfram can check the issue when being back in the office.
>
> rsc
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>



-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list