[PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] Xilinx: of_serial support for Xilinx uart 16550.

[Segher Boessenkool]

>> Personally, I'm not fond of this approach.  There is already some
>> traction to using the reg-shift property to specify spacing, and I
>> think it would be appropriate to also define a reg-offset property to
>> handle the +3 offset and then let the xilinx 16550 nodes use those.
>
> Why do we need a reg-offset property when we can just add the offset
> to the appropriate word(s) in the reg property?

Because if you do that, the "reg" property cannot describe the full
register block (it misses the first few bytes).  Not a huge problem
in practice, sure.


Segher