[Resend][PATCH 1/8][Version 2] MPC5121 Update MPC5121ADS device tree
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sun Jun 29 16:12:30 EST 2008
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Updated device tree for MPC5121ADS
Really should be more detailed in the commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <jrigby at freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts | 309 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts
> index 94ad7b2..67dc920 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> - * MPC5121E MDS Device Tree Source
> + * MPC5121E ADS Device Tree Source
> *
> - * Copyright 2007 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
> + * Copyright 2007,2008 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
> *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> + aliases {
> + pci = &pci;
> + };
> +
> cpus {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -39,6 +43,39 @@
> reg = <0x00000000 0x10000000>; // 256MB at 0
> };
>
> + mbx at 20000000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-mbx";
> + reg = <0x20000000 0x4000>;
> + interrupts = <66 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + sram at 30000000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-sram";
> + reg = <0x30000000 0x20000>; // 128K at 0x30000000
> + };
> +
> + nfc at 40000000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-nfc";
> + reg = <0x40000000 0x100000>; // 1M at 0x40000000
> + interrupts = <6 8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + bank-width = <1>;
> + // ADS has two Hynix 512MB Nand flash chips in a single
> + // stacked package .
> + chips = <2>;
> + nand0 at 0 {
> + label = "nand0";
> + reg = <0x00000000 0x02000000>; // first 32 MB of chip 0
> + };
> + nand1 at 20000000 {
> + label = "nand1";
> + reg = <0x20000000 0x02000000>; // first 32 MB of chip 1
> + };
> + };
> +
> localbus at 80000020 {
> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121ads-localbus";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> @@ -51,18 +88,56 @@
> flash at 0,0 {
> compatible = "cfi-flash";
> reg = <0 0x0 0x4000000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> bank-width = <4>;
> - device-width = <1>;
> + device-width = <2>;
> + protected at 0 {
> + label = "protected";
> + reg = <0x00000000 0x00040000>; // first sector is protected
> + read-only;
> + };
> + filesystem at 40000 {
> + label = "filesystem";
> + reg = <0x00040000 0x03c00000>; // 60M for filesystem
> + };
> + kernel at 3c40000 {
> + label = "kernel";
> + reg = <0x03c40000 0x00280000>; // 2.5M for kernel
> + };
> + device-tree at 3ec0000 {
> + label = "device-tree";
> + reg = <0x03ec0000 0x00040000>; // one sector for device tree
> + };
> + u-boot at 3f00000 {
> + label = "u-boot";
> + reg = <0x03f00000 0x00100000>; // 1M for u-boot
> + read-only;
> + };
> };
>
> board-control at 2,0 {
> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121ads-cpld";
> reg = <0x2 0x0 0x8000>;
> };
> +
> + cpld_pic: pic at 2,a {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121ads-cpld-pic";
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + reg = <0x2 0xa 0x5>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + // irq routing
> + // all irqs but touch screen are routed to irq0 (ipic 48)
> + // touch screen is statically routed to irq1 (ipic 17)
> + // so don't use it here
> + interrupts = <48 0x8>;
> + };
> };
>
> soc at 80000000 {
> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-immr";
> + device_type = "soc";
Don't do this. I know it exists on older board ports, but it is bad
practice. Depend entirely on the compatible value instead.
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> @@ -85,38 +160,252 @@
> reg = <0xc00 0x100>;
> };
>
> - // 512x PSCs are not 52xx PSCs compatible
> + rtc at a00 { // Real time clock
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-rtc";
> + reg = <0xa00 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <79 0x8 80 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + clock at f00 { // Clock control
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-clock";
> + reg = <0xf00 0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + pmc at 1000{ //Power Management Controller
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-pmc";
> + reg = <0x1000 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <83 0x2>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + gpio at 1100 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-gpio";
> + reg = <0x1100 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <78 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + mscan at 1300 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-mscan";
> + cell-index = <0>;
> + interrupts = <12 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + reg = <0x1300 0x80>;
> + };
> +
> + mscan at 1380 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-mscan";
> + cell-index = <1>;
> + interrupts = <13 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + reg = <0x1380 0x80>;
> + };
> +
> + i2c at 1700 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fsl-i2c";
should be 'compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-i2c", "fsl-i2c";' for completeness.
Ditto through the rest of the i2c nodes.
> + cell-index = <0>;
> + reg = <0x1700 0x20>;
> + interrupts = <9 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + fsl5200-clocking;
> + };
> +
> + i2c at 1720 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fsl-i2c";
> + cell-index = <1>;
> + reg = <0x1720 0x20>;
> + interrupts = <10 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + fsl5200-clocking;
> + };
> +
> + i2c at 1740 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fsl-i2c";
> + cell-index = <2>;
> + reg = <0x1740 0x20>;
> + interrupts = <11 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + fsl5200-clocking;
> + };
> +
> + i2ccontrol at 1760 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-i2c-ctrl";
> + reg = <0x1760 0x8>;
> + };
> +
> + axe at 2000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-axe";
> + reg = <0x2000 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <42 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + display at 2100 {
> + compatible = "fsl-diu";
should be 'compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-diu", "fsl-diu".
Actually, I don't like "fsl-diu" at all and I'd rather see it gone
entirely, but that is a separate battle.
> + reg = <0x2100 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <64 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + mdio at 2800 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-fec-mdio";
> + reg = <0x2800 0x800>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + phy: ethernet-phy at 0 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + device_type = "ethernet-phy";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + ethernet at 2800 {
> + device_type = "network";
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-fec";
> + reg = <0x2800 0x800>;
> + local-mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
> + interrupts = <4 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + phy-handle = < &phy >;
> + fsl,align-tx-packets = <4>;
> + };
> +
> + // 5121e has two dr usb modules
> + // mpc5121_ads only uses USB0
> +
> + // USB1 using external ULPI PHY
> + //usb at 3000 {
> + // compatible = "fsl-usb2-dr";
I know it is commented out, but same comment applies.
> + // reg = <0x3000 0x1000>;
> + // #address-cells = <1>;
> + // #size-cells = <0>;
> + // interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + // interrupts = <43 0x8>;
> + // dr_mode = "otg";
> + // phy_type = "ulpi";
> + // port1;
> + //};
> +
> + // USB0 using internal UTMI PHY
> + usb at 4000 {
> + compatible = "fsl-usb2-dr";
ditto
> + reg = <0x4000 0x1000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + interrupts = <44 0x8>;
> + dr_mode = "otg";
> + phy_type = "utmi_wide";
> + port0;
> + };
> +
> + // IO control
> + ioctl at a000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-ioctl";
> + reg = <0xA000 0x1000>;
> + };
> +
> + pata at 10200 {
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-pata";
> + reg = <0x10200 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <5 0x8>;
> + interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
> + };
> +
> + // 512x PSCs are not 52xx PSC compatible
> // PSC3 serial port A aka ttyPSC0
> serial at 11300 {
> device_type = "serial";
> - compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-psc-uart";
> + compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-psc-uart", "fsl,mpc5121-psc";
I'm not sure about this, it kind of mixes usages. But on the other
hand, it gracefully solves the problem of identifying all PSCs,
regardless of the mode.... it doesn't break any major conventions, so
yeah; this is probably good.
g.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list