[PATCH 59/60] microblaze_v4: syscall_table.S and unistd.h

[H. Peter Anvin]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> You still set __NR_fork. There is no point defining the number if you
> can't actually call the syscall in the first place.
> 

Worse, it is actively *harmful* to set the number; klibc or anything 
that uses similar kinds of scripts for portability will see the symbol 
and think the system call is available.

	-hpa