"cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes
Timur Tabi
timur at freescale.com
Fri Jun 6 01:18:30 EST 2008
Josh Boyer wrote:
> seems to be a more distinct definition of what this is. But I have no
> idea how well that would go over, and it would probably need to be
> changed in all the fsl boards as well.
Which would end up breaking backwards compatibility with older device trees.
Like I said earlier, I'm in favor of expanding the definition of "cell-index".
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list