"cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes

Timur Tabi timur at freescale.com
Fri Jun 6 01:18:30 EST 2008


Josh Boyer wrote:

> seems to be a more distinct definition of what this is.  But I have no
> idea how well that would go over, and it would probably need to be
> changed in all the fsl boards as well.

Which would end up breaking backwards compatibility with older device trees.
Like I said earlier, I'm in favor of expanding the definition of "cell-index".

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list