"cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes
Timur Tabi
timur at freescale.com
Fri Jun 6 01:13:15 EST 2008
Josh Boyer wrote:
> From a device tree perspective, index and cell-index are both
> incorrect. The IIC macros don't share register blocks with anything,
> are enumerated as unique instances per macro in the device tree, and
> should be able to be distinguished by "regs" and/or unit address.
I think we should just expand the definition of cell-index to include standard
device enumeration for when it's needed. The original definition is too
limited, IMHO.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list