[RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Jul 26 05:38:28 EST 2008

On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:

> On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 13:10 -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>> Shouldn't this (and other places) be:
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_44x) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)
>>>> if you are going to exclude 40x for now?  Otherwise this is still
>>>> enabled on 405 and setting the wrong register.
>>>> josh
>>> Yes, sorry. I wasn't aware of this specific define value. It makes
>>> things easier to support 405's later.
>>> Like so?
>> Please, next time, when you re-send a patch like that, re-include
>> the full subject and patch description. You can add then blurbs after
>> the --- line if you want to add things that won't make it to git.
>> I'll deal with that specific one for now.
> Ben,  I want to make sure this works on FSL Book-E before it gets  
> into tree and I need to think about what SMP issues it might have.
> I talked to Josh about this at OLS and if you are ok I can deal with  
> acceptance of this patch via my tree.

Josh pointed out that you went ahead and merged this.  Curse you :)

I've got a patch in my tree to address my initial concerns.

- k

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list