[RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support

[Kumar Gala]

On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 13:10 -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> Shouldn't this (and other places) be:
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_44x) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)
>>>
>>> if you are going to exclude 40x for now?  Otherwise this is still
>>> enabled on 405 and setting the wrong register.
>>>
>>> josh
>>
>> Yes, sorry. I wasn't aware of this specific define value. It makes
>> things easier to support 405's later.
>>
>> Like so?
>
> Please, next time, when you re-send a patch like that, re-include
> the full subject and patch description. You can add then blurbs after
> the --- line if you want to add things that won't make it to git.
>
> I'll deal with that specific one for now.

Ben,  I want to make sure this works on FSL Book-E before it gets into  
tree and I need to think about what SMP issues it might have.

I talked to Josh about this at OLS and if you are ok I can deal with  
acceptance of this patch via my tree.

- k