patchwork missing patches?
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Feb 28 12:35:15 EST 2008
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:00:00 +1100
Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org> wrote:
> Josh Boyer writes:
>
> > I'm trying to find some patches that went to the list recently in
> > patchwork and they seem to be missing. Here are a few:
> >
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052196.html
>
> That one was in "awaiting upstream" state since I put it in the
> bundle, then realized it should probably go through your tree, and
> didn't apply it. I've put it back to "new" state now.
Ok. Not sure why I couldn't find it under the "All" state earlier. I
see it now.
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052164.html
>
> I seem to recall putting that one in "changes requested" state, but
> now I can't find it either. Strange...
"changes requested" is what I was expecting, but didn't see it.
Strange indeed.
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052129.html
>
> Not sure where that one has gone.
It's not overly important, since it was whitespace corrupted and I have
a fixed version anyway. But it's still odd it's not on patchwork.
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052050.html
>
> I have been deleting patches that go through other maintainers to try
> to keep the number of patches down to a manageable level, and that
> includes ibm_newemac patches, since they go through Jeff Garzik.
> That's probably what happened to this one. I'll leave ibm_newemac
> patches alone if you promise to clean them up periodically. :)
Oh, I didn't realize you could actually outright delete them. I tend
to look after ibm_newemac because it's mostly related to 4xx and I get
to bug BenH to do the jgarzik bugging because he said he wants to be
the maintainer. I have no problems cleaning them up.
josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list