[PATCH 1/2] [MTD] Add support for RAM & ROM mappings in the physmap_of MTD driver.
Laurent Pinchart
laurentp at cse-semaphore.com
Fri Apr 25 21:53:10 EST 2008
On Wednesday 23 April 2008 13:12, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> >>>>Ok. I'll submit a new patch as soon as we agree on a compatible name.
>
> >>>Did we?
>
> >> IIRC, The latest agreement was that we don't need the "compatible" and
> >>will match on node name.
>
> > Ok. Is there a current patch I should be merging?
>
> Looks like it was decided to revert to the platform device method, not
> sure why -- so, no changes. Laurent?
Last thing I heard was that the device tree should not encode a device's
expected usage, so memory nodes should not have any compatible property that
would automatically associated them to an MTD driver. I've been adviced to
add platform-specific code to instantiate a platform device manually
(possibly checking if the required memory node is present in the device
tree). This arguably makes sense, but adds more platform-specific code.
So, no need for a patch so far.
--
Laurent Pinchart
CSE Semaphore Belgium
Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A
B-1410 Waterloo
Belgium
T +32 (2) 387 42 59
F +32 (2) 387 42 75
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20080425/823a6bf2/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list