[PATCH 1/3 v3] Raise the upper limit of NR_CPUS.
Tony Breeds
tony at bakeyournoodle.com
Wed Apr 23 16:08:36 EST 2008
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:41:39PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> You add about 30 lines of code in this patch, which you remove in patch
> 3, is there a better way to do it?
>
> Is there any harm dynamically initialising the statically initialised
> pacas, I think that would allow you to basically skip the
> NR_STATIC_PACAS business.
Yes, I could make patch 2 the first in the series, and then roll batches
1 and 3 together. As iSeries will barf I do all the PACAs dynamically
without that extra wait.
/me is too linear.
new version comming.
Yours Tony
linux.conf.au http://www.marchsouth.org/
Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list