[PATCH 1/3 v3] Raise the upper limit of NR_CPUS.

Tony Breeds tony at bakeyournoodle.com
Wed Apr 23 16:08:36 EST 2008


On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:41:39PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
 
> You add about 30 lines of code in this patch, which you remove in patch
> 3, is there a better way to do it?
> 
> Is there any harm dynamically initialising the statically initialised
> pacas, I think that would allow you to basically skip the
> NR_STATIC_PACAS business.

Yes, I could make patch 2 the first in the series, and then roll batches
1 and 3 together.  As iSeries will barf I do all the PACAs dynamically
without that extra wait.

/me is too linear.

new version comming.

Yours Tony

  linux.conf.au    http://www.marchsouth.org/
  Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list