[PATCH] 86xx: mark functions static, other minor cleanups

[Timur Tabi]

Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> Valid point.  Is there a precedent here -- like a printk indicating
> that the old ID matched, to let the user know?

Not really, but a pr_warning() would be nice.

> Actually on this one, we are OK, since the board support didn't exist
> in the default kernel until I'd just sent it last week.

No problem, then.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale