[PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup
Anton Vorontsov
avorontsov at ru.mvista.com
Sat Apr 12 03:21:06 EST 2008
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> > Or maybe I'm thinking here in terms of "fsl,ucc"... and cell-index is
> > indeed should be -1... don't know. Please decide. ;-)
>
> Well, that's what I was thinking. cell-index is zero-based, so UCC1 should have
> cell-index = <0>.
>
> Of course, this means all the code needs to change, since I think device-id is
> one-based.
Yup. You raised a really good question, because we're _introducing_
cell-index for UCC nodes, and if we'll choice wrong numbering scheme
now, then there will be no way back w/o breaking backward compatibility.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru at gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list