[PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup
Timur Tabi
timur at freescale.com
Sat Apr 12 03:08:17 EST 2008
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> Do we want the first UCC to have a cell-index of 1? Maybe we should fix this
>> off-by-one error once and for all, and number all UCCs from 0?
>
> Isn't documentation numbers UCC from 1?
Yes.
> Then I believe we should stick
> with it for device tree, since off by one is Linux implementation details.
Fair enough.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list