[PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

Timur Tabi timur at freescale.com
Sat Apr 12 03:08:17 EST 2008


Anton Vorontsov wrote:

>> Do we want the first UCC to have a cell-index of 1?  Maybe we should fix this
>> off-by-one error once and for all, and number all UCCs from 0?
> 
> Isn't documentation numbers UCC from 1? 

Yes.

> Then I believe we should stick
> with it for device tree, since off by one is Linux implementation details.

Fair enough.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list