[PATCH] FCC: fix confused base / offset
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Apr 10 03:39:48 EST 2008
Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Right, so it's probably not worth the effort. I stumbled on this while
> porting my board to the new binding code. I was quite confused when
> seeing this so I made this fix to understand what's going on here.
>
> BTW have you tested the FCC driver with the new binding code?
Yes.
> I do not
> manage to get it working. Everything seems to be fine but
> fs_enet_start_xmit does not send a packet and no interrupts are
> arriving.
What does your device tree look like? Are all the pins and clocks set
up properly? Does the PHY negotiate OK? Is any error reported in the
descriptor?
>> Does this break arch/ppc, BTW?
>
> Yes. arch=ppc is out of my scope, so I forget about it regularly, sorry.
> It breaks arch/ppc/platforms/mpc8272ads_setup.c which can be easily
> fixed though. But as the mpc8272ads is supported with arch=powerpc,
> shouldn't it go away anyway?
arch/ppc is going away entirely in June or so. !CONFIG_PPC_NEW_BINDING
in arch/powerpc is going away as soon as I can unlazy myself enough to
send a patch. :-)
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list